My sweet,
can’t you just be satisfied with everything I’ve already given you? … my entire
body is yours to hold and caress… Isn’t it enough, all that? In that case,
perhaps it’s not me that you love, but only what I refuse to let you have?
Pierre Louÿs, La femme et le pantin (1898)
Every so
often a silent film not only surprises you but pulls you to the edge of your
armchair and has you blinking at the screen in delight. So, it is with the story
and the actress in La femme et le pantin (1929) in which Conchita
Montenegro’s dancer not only beguiles and bewilders her puppet, Don Mateo, she
completely un-mans him in the most feminist of ways reaching right out from
1929 with dazzling power and beauty. If anyone has a thousand ships that need
launching… here’s your woman!
Based on Pierre
Louÿs’ 1898 novel of the same name, the story was adapted as an opera in 1911 by
composer Riccardo Zandonai, before its first film version in 1920, an American film
directed by Reginald Barker and starring Geraldine Farrar – which it’s hard to
imagine having the same force as this version directed by Jacques de Baroncelli.
The story is also a familiar one as it was also filmed as That Obscure
Object of Desire (Cet obscur objet du désir) (1977) by Luis Buñuel
but… imagine some of that director’s intentions and frankness being on display
half a century before? de Baroncelli is that bold as, indeed, is his star
performer and, looking up on Louÿs’ background of erotic prose and poetry, the
man to whom Oscar Wilde dedicated the original French publication of Salome,
and who signed a copy of Dorian Grey* to thank him for his revision of
the book's manuscript… it’s difficult to see anything like a literal adaptation
being made anywhere else but France at this time.
Tristan Sévère |
The film
transgresses in so many ways, not least the obvious ones with Montenegro
dancing in the nude, with nothing left to the imagination save for that which her
syncopated physicality implies, which, for a seventeen-year-old, comes with an
extra layer of “obscurity” for modern audiences even if perhaps less so at the
time? That said, the man she entrances is described as an ageing aristocrat here
played by Tristan Sévère who was only 25 but greyed up, with Don Mateo being 37
in the book whilst Conchita is just 15.
Where The
Woman and the Puppet really differentiates it’s risk-taking is in giving
Conchita almost complete agency and not simply in a vampy way – no evil Theda
here – but with a character who knows the measure of her man and who isn’t
toying with him she is stress-testing his love to destruction if required. This
is not so much in revenge for his daring to acquire her but a genuine mission
to establish the truth of their relationship or at least that’s the way it
seemed to me on a single viewing.
The film
begins with an image of four female dancers bouncing a male puppet up and down
on a blanket stretched between them. This is taken from a painting by Francisco
de Goya y Lucientes, The Straw Maniken, (1791–92) which is, now as then,
in the Museo del Prado in Madrid and which, in the book, Don Mateo refers to while
lamenting how Concha treats him. Here it is re-enacted with Conchita holding
one edge and Don Mateo twisted in flaccid rage just as the puppet… he can’t
live with her and he can’t live without. He wants the one he can’t have, and it’s
driving him mad as Stephen Morrisey sang sometime later.
Don Mateo being all manly |
This
madness begins, as does so much, on a train journey and there’s a magnificent
shot of a steam train set against the alpine snow on which we find the jaded
Don Mateo “notorious throughout Spain for his fortune and his female
conquests”. Accompanied by his friend André Stinvenol (Henri Lévêque) he
goes to watch the Spanish dancers in third class where he interrupts a fight
between an older woman played by Andrée Canti with whom I would not mess and a
ferocious yet out-matched Conchita Perez, who is afraid of no one and, after
laughing at her opponents dancing, mocked her still further with her own dance.
I
kissed you because I liked you but you can’t kiss me without loving me!
Don Mateo
is captivated for all the humdrum reasons men usually are – and my Gen Z
daughter was pretty frank on this point viewing the film… but their moment ends
on the train. Months later at a lavish party in his villa, Conchita makes her
way in to say hello and to tell him where she lives in Calle Monteros with her
mother. Don Mateo duly goes to visit only to be befuddled by Concha’s pulling
away when he tries to take her affection for granted. Nevertheless she invites
him back and he is soon “madly in love” with this very young woman who is so
far below his social class and yet exerts such power.
Don Mateo
tells her mother that he wants to make Concha “part of his life” and the young
woman having seen him hand over a sum of money, then flies into a rage with
both parent and paramour; “I longed to give myself to you. You wanted to buy
me.” As Paola Cristalli, quoted in the programme notes, observed in 2020: “There
is always something that stands between Don Mateo’s gaze and the object of his
attraction…” but it is also his own failure to truly understand her and his
inability to communicate. It is incapacity to trust and, knowing him a jealous
man, Conchita uses a friend’s lover to push and test still further.
Even when
Don Mateo finally cracks and resorts to the violence we always expected, she
makes him pay in her own time even after telling him it is a sign of his true
affection. It’s not, he is reduced by the aggression and shows that the kind of
love she needs is beyond him on the basest of human levels.
If this
makes the film sound frustrating it is anything but with good performances from
the support and this amazing central display of nuanced force from Montenegro.
Is the nude rude as Nell Shipman’s self-promotion asked a decade before? It’s
gratuitous of course, but it does show that Concha has some level of control
even when she makes this decision – the men watching her are diminished and, of
course, Don Mateo falls short yet again in his response. A complex and
unexpectedly challenging film that reminds us once again to never
under-estimate the makers of these films.
For the
live screening Günter A. Buchwald on piano and violin was accompanied by Frank
Bockius on percussion but the live stream had Günter’s magnificent new score
played by himself and orchestra. I really hope there’s another chance to
view and here this in the UK or Italy. Restored in 2020, it’s one of the standout discoveries –
for me – of the last few years.
Conchita Montenegro abides... |
*Recently
sold at Christies, details here!
**PaolaCristalli’s notes for an August 2020 screening in Bologna.
Goya's Puppet |
Thank you for the efforts you made in writing this article. Keep Blogging!!
ReplyDeleteImpressive ideas in concerning blogging. Its great article man!
ReplyDeleteIts awesome, I admire this blog here. Awesome article, keep doing it! thanks!
ReplyDeleteI will support you. Such a very useful article. A must read post, Thanks a lot
ReplyDelete