Almost from the get-go silent films tackled their theatrical cousins, retelling plays as if words really didn’t matter. Risky at the best of times such missions were surely impossible when it came to the sophisticated wordplay of Oscar Wilde.
Nazimova did it with interpretive dance and audacious mise en scène for Salomy but here Enrst Lubitsch takes on Oscar using the wit
and sophistication of his direction. Sure there are some excellent performances
but Ernst’s inch-perfect positioning, cross-cutting and way with purely visual
messaging ensures that this take on a wordy, comedy of manners works.
He hardly needs to use title cards as the mood is
established, explained and maintained throughout in what is one of the neatest
films of the Twenties: so balanced and perfectly timed, shot and performed… I’m
finally getting to feel that “touch” the grown-ups talk about – the delicate
use of key signifiers to lift the tale above predictability and to convey small
explosions of meaning in unexpected ways.
Take, for example, that fan… it’s everywhere: a symbol of
marital love, a potential assault weapon, distraction under duress and
incriminating evidence. It’s just a fan but Lubitsch uses it so very well.
Put that fan in the hands of an actress as undeniably
fine as Irene Rich and you have a symbol of motherly sacrifice, unbreakable
choices that have to be made and confirmation that true love does indeed
conquer all.
Irene Rich |
I was expecting a witty disappointment but what I got was
a riveting 86 minutes that might just be one of the greatest cinematic
adaptations o f a play: Lubitsch using massive, high and wide sets through
which his characters drift in their torments in one sequence a wife and her
would be lover changing places over a room that must be 80 feet long – there is
no way they can meet in the middle: they are doomed by circumstance to orbit
and never embrace in cosmic collision. Unless, that is, a new stellar object
appears to play havoc with the order of this mannered and moneyed universe…
May McAvoy |
All begins with Lady Windermere (May McAvoy) facing the
troublesome decisions of where to seat her dinner guests at her impending
birthday party: where to put the dashing and entertaining Lord Darlington
(Ronald Colman), right next to her ladyship… at the head of the table perhaps? Talk
of the Devil… the Lord arrives to bring handsome substance to her reverie… She
presumes he’s come to see her husband… but not this time.
Meanwhile Lord Windermere (Bert Lytell) is discovering
something even more disturbing… A Mrs. Edith Erlynne has written to him
claiming to be his wife’s mother who was lost to disgrace a long time ago with
her daughter having grown up believing her dead and a great moral example…
Bert Lytell |
Mrs. Erlynne (superbly played by Miss Rich) duly arrives
and uses this unfortunate connection to extract some financial support from
Windermere – her elegant blackmail expressed through sight of a cheque and the
Lord having to add a one to the five hundred he’s started writing following one
smiling glance… His wife must never know of her mother’s disgrace. Rich was
just 34 at the time and whilst that initially seems too young… when you do the
maths it’s close enough.
Mrs. Erlynne begins to lead an “extravagant” life with
Windermere’s support, “…not accepted by society but the subject of its gossip…”
There’s a terrific scene at the races when “society” spies in fascination at
the intriguing interloper: spy glasses from both men and women including The
Duchess of Berwick (Carrie Daumery) leader of the pack. We see multiple points
of view until Mrs E. sits down just in front of a group including Lady Windermere
her husband, admirer and the gossips.
A day at the races |
Examining the back of her head with her binoculars the
Duchess is delighted to see that Mrs E is going slightly grey and then, seeing
her jewels, ponders where her money comes from. All wonderfully bitchy in Oscar
Wilde’s immortal way.
Sat with them is one of London’s most eligible Lord
Augustus Lorton (Edward Martindel) who spies this fine filly and is intrigued.
As the lady leaves he follows with the director showing their pursuit in
longshot, small figures against a backdrop of advertisement-plastered walls: the
camera gradually masqued to narrow the screen as Lord closes in on Lady…
The Lord in pursuit |
Lorton goes to visit and Lubitsch uses the manner of his
entrances to illustrate the developing relationship: at first formal, waiting
to be shown through by the maid and then advancing from front door to drawing
room with barely a pause: his familiarity only halted by Edith’s last minute swerve:
he’s keen.
Meanwhile Darlington can’t help himself and casts
aspersions about Lord Windermere’s relationship with Edith. Lady W can scare
believe it but sure enough she discovers chequebook evidence of multiple
payments to this strange woman… Rumbled, Windermere refuses to reveal all and
asks his wife to take his word.
Things are coming to a head though as Windermere asks to
re-introduce Edith to society at his wife’s birthday party but she threatens to
use the lovely fan he has bought her to assault the interloper… Having invited
Edith, Windermere’s un-invitation isn’t seen in time before she arrives to
potential humiliation. Cue Lord Lorton who arrives to sweep her into the room –
her daughter, the two men chasing her affections and so many idle tongues
gathered all in one room…
I won’t give any more away save to say that the fan
becomes a significant character almost in its own right.
Garden liaison |
The film presents almost as Lubitsch in the raw; it’s
very pared down with the focus on character and movement. The sets are elegant
and but, as with the racecourse, recede far behind the foregrounded players all
of whom are sophisticated and in the cases of the main leads, sensitive.
The cinematography of Charles Van Enger matches his director’s
vision and allows for a story so reliant on words to transition so well to the
silent screen.
Ronald Coleman and May McAvoy |
Wilde and Lubitsch is a marriage made in Hollywood
though: two men of subtle wit and piercing insights into polite society
constrained by manners and rules almost designed to prevent happiness. Any
triumph of love is almost accidental and always against the odds: perhaps these
folk aren’t much different from those who watch them in the dark?
I watched the version on the More Treasures from American Film Archives 1894-1931 box set which
comes with a sparkly new piano score – it’s available direct or from Amazon but
is now collectable – time for a re-release!
Agreed; a silent film adaptation of Wilde sounds like a tough sell, but this is such a beautifully elegant film. Lubitsch knocks it out of the park.
ReplyDeleteIt's a masterclass of poised and subtle cinema! One of his best. P
Delete