“In many respects, the
second film is much superior to the first… a powerful work (that) … proves for
the second time that in film, pure art can have great success.” Hans Heinz
Ewer, 1930
In her insightful and entertaining introduction, Weimar expert,
Miranda Gower-Qian, described this film as essentially a “doppelgänger” of itself, it
being a broad “remake” of the 1913 version with Paul Wegener. The film re-doubles
the force of Hans Heinz Ewer’s 1913 story with this re-telling and uses that as
a launching point for a dramatic enhancement of the ideas drawn principally from
Edgar Allen Poe’s William Wilson with
a smattering of Faust; as Miranda
said, pulling in German Romanticism along with contemporary ideas of
individuality and ambition.
For Conrad Veidt’s Balduin to succeed, it’s not just that
his friends must fail but that he also must be sacrificed. Balduin’s doppelgänger
represents the darker side of his ambition and desires… he ends up ignoring the
pure love of a flower-girl, Lyduschka (Elizza La Porta), casting away her
pauper’s posy, in his frustrated pursuit of rich girl, Margit von Schwarzenberg
(Agnes Esterhazy) and he’ll cheat at all costs to get what he wants.
Veidt, Krauss and Veidt |
In this way the film tapped into the Weimar zeitgeist and what
Siegfried Kracauer later called “a deep and fearful concern with the
foundations of the self. So, forget expressionist cinema this could rightly be
termed existential cinema which incorporated elements of the former and added
much else besides.
Henrik Galeen directed and co-scripted with Ewer and he was,
as Miranda said, chiefly known as one of Weimar’s best scripters, with work on
both Golems, Nosferatu and Waxworks amongst
others. The result is a sumptuous mix of stunning framing, lighting and fluid
camerawork from Günther Krampf and an uncredited Erich Nitzschmann, that capture
magnificent rural settings as characters ponder by lakes, dramatic action as Balduin tries to save Margit on her horse and add haunting atmospherics to
the tale. Selling your soul to the Devil is one thing but selling it to yourself
is altogether more unsettling.
Conrad and Krauss |
There’s a far more bucolic set up for Balduin’s
fateful deal than in 1913, not surprisingly perhaps, although that version does
have some excellent exterior shots. Veidt gives Balduin far more mystery and
depth than Wegener and manages to unsettle the audience through changes
in physicality and expression. Make no mistake, Der Student is “concentrated
Connie” and it established him at a higher level internationally with what Pat
Wilks Battle described as his greatest starring role of the silent era.
His student maybe the finest swordsman in Prague but he is
also one of the most impoverished. He broods while the others mess about,
drunkenly pawing at Lyduschka in the tavern and challenging each other to duals.
Many of the students carry duelling scars and whether this was down to casting
or make-up, there’s no denying that duelling and the scars that went with it
were very popular among the military schools of this period. Balduin carries no
scars and shows just why as he runs rings around an objectionable colleague
he challenges to protect Lyduschka’s honour.
But Balduin is broke and susceptible to the enticements of soul-loan-shark
Scapinelli (Werner Krauss, without whom, no supernatural Weimar film is
complete) who offers him 600,000 gold coins in exchange for just one thing from Balduin’s
bare lodgings. Laughing, the student signs off on the deal only for Scapinelli
to take his reflection from the mirror… who needs a reflection, you ask
yourself? Well, it’s more than a shadow…
Scapinelli also helps set up Balduin with Margit as he
rescues her from her bolting horse following a stampede engineered by the old
man with a wave of his arms and an evil grin: our hero is playing with fire and
doesn’t know it yet; ambition and material success come first.
Agnes Esterhazy |
Naturally there’ll be a reckoning but the film is so well
paced and engaging we almost forget its coming. I wasn’t disappointed with Der Student and it is indeed one of
Weimar’s finest.
Accompaniment was provided by Stephen Horne who made light
of the two-hour running time and maintained atmospherics and tension throughout
with emotionally literate improvisations that lent so much weight to the
uncanny drama on screen. Perhaps the soul of Balduin/Connie was on hand to
guide him… he sees and he hears dead people and is our musical medium
connecting the modern day to the mood and mystique on 1926 film.
We saw a projection of the excellent reconstruction by
Filmuseum München and it was a fine copy with clarity and excellent tinted
detail... enough to see right into the Veidt!
Ah, it sounds fabulous! I have been meaning to watch this for years - I love the 1913 Wegener version. Thanks for the recap :)
ReplyDeleteTechnique obviously changed alot in 13 years but this is ot only a better film, it has a great performance from Connie too! Must be due a BR/DVD release from Editionfilmuseum... :-)
Delete