Showing posts with label Intolerance (1916). Show all posts
Showing posts with label Intolerance (1916). Show all posts

Sunday, 20 September 2020

The Griffith Cut… The Mother and the Law (1919), more Miriam Cooper

 

“I bit my lip and drew blood. The camera stayed on my face and you can see the blood run down my chin, I didn’t even feel the pain so intent was I on what I was doing…”*

 

As unreliable and opinionated a witness as she was in her biography, Miriam Cooper truly was the Dark Lady of the Silents and the scene she is referring to was one I almost dismissed as too over the top. Miriam plays The Friendless One, is a woman wronged spying on her gangster lover as he tries to force Mae Murray’s innocent into sex; it’s horrible on both those levels and Miriam is carrying a gun that she is terrified of using and yet so compelled with anger she really wants to.

 

By coincidence she is in the same position as Vincent Cassel in La Haine (currently on re-release !) who really wants to kill a fascist skinhead and yet struggles to hold himself back from the fateful moment. As Cassel goes through all manner of moral torments his face is contorted in much the same way as Cooper’s as she bites her lip and the blood flows. Is she trying to shock herself away from this course of action or is her hate so intense she no longer cares who she hurts, even herself? Either way, you can sense Griffith’s prompting as Cooper reacted with Gish-like method and Billy Bitzer’s camera kept on rolling… just as it did for her co-star Mae Marsh.

 

Marsh said in 1917, “I have seen Intolerance twenty times, I suppose, and it never occurs to me that ‘The Girl’ in the modern epic is myself. It is all Mr. Griffith…In his pictures everything - scenery and players- is just so many instruments in his orchestra.” Stuck as he was between radically different moral and political views, Griffith felt that 'motion pictures must be true to life saying that "the truer they are the greater they are.'" His view of “truth” was, of course, as subjective as yours and mine but we can all agree on a bloodied lip.


Robert Harron and Mae Marsh

The Mother and the Law has one of the most complex gestations in silent film having originally been filmed just after Birth of a Nation as a small budget drama concerning a couple down and out in the big city. Before BoaN was even released though, Griffith was plotting his next move and the result would be the epic Intolerance of which the film would form just one of the four strands. Intolerance unachieved at the box office and in 1919 the director re-cut this film along with the Babylonian sequence with the effervescent Constance Talmadge.

 

Both are on the Masters of Cinema Intolerance Blu-ray and Mother is especially worth viewing as a separate film as Griffith included more footage and rounded out parts of his story and some of the characters, not least Cooper’s Friendless One (honestly DW, why not just call her Francine or something?).

 

Arthur Lennig, has written about the film in Film History , 2005, Vol. 17, No. 4, Unfashionable, Overlooked or Under Estimated (2005, Indiana University Press)* and establishes that: “Once Griffith decided to make Intolerance, The Mother and the Law would be changed from a simple story into an audacious indictment of how large social, economic, and moral pressures affect the lives of the principal characters.”


Miss Jenkins at a society ball, realising people have too much fun...

Griffith’s target for intolerance seems an odd one for modern viewers in that he decided that some charitable organisations, “up-lifters”, were in it for their own glory. In the film their commitment to the expense of too much charity leads to lay-offs, as the factory owner needs to pay for his barren sister’s indulgences. This triggers a violent strike and the main characters’ fall into poverty and further intolerance, yet it does seem more than a little convoluted: which industrialist is seriously going to cut salaries in order to fund his sibling’s pet charity? This, of course, did not go unnoticed at the time and in the 1919 cut, the director is at pains to explain that he doesn’t mean all charities only those run by bored, sexually frustrated women and not the Salvation Army, the church and the majority of "charitable" charities. DW was however inspired by contemporary government reports and, according to Lenning, “…had in mind John D. Rockefeller, who by this time was managing much of his father's fortune… a pious and sheltered young man opposed to whatever he considered licentious, including drinking and dancing…”

 

For Griffith, mankind’s moral weakness could only be changed by appealing to people’s good conscience and not by legislation and force. It is an argument for the ages from the country that was to prohibit the sale of alcohol in 1920 and which, even today, is reluctant to force its citizens to wear face masks or not own automatic rifles.

 

These “intolerables” who don’t tolerate poverty and unchristian behaviour from the undeserving poor are not DGW’s only target in the film and, as Lennig argues, he was concerned with the inequalities created by “indifferent capitalism”, criminality and the death penalty. So, to give him his due, The Mother and the Law is if nothing else a damning inditement of the latter. Lenning quotes assistant cameraman Karl Brown on the impact a visit to San Quentin – “an actual prison inhabited by living dead men” – had on his director who then made sure that the film’s execution sequence was as accurate as possible. The three men standing ready with razors ready to cut the ribbons that drop the panel between the doomed man’s feet is particularly unsettling; as with a firing squad, they would never know which cut was the quickest.

 

Griffith's meticulous gallows


Griffith is also critical of “indifferent capitalism” and not just in its preference to indulge “self-proclaimed do-gooders” rather than pay a living wage. Uncaring industrial cost-cutting leads all three of our main characters to the slums and criminality and whilst DW would have recoiled at socialist solutions he was strangely on the same page with regards to the plight of Marx’s “industrial reserve army”, the under-employed.

 

“Bitter mistakes” unbalance society with Cooper’s Friendless One and “her first love”, The Boy (Robert Harron, who doesn’t get enough press!) and The Dear One (Mae Marsh) all displaced from Jenkins Mill and semi-rural idyll, and forced to fend for themselves in the city where they “flounder helplessly in the nets of fate”.

 

Miriam’s good looks get her the attention of a Musketeer of the Slums (Walter Long who played a black-faced villain in BoaN) and work as a hostess in his bar. It is unclear if she becomes a prostitute but she becomes the Musketeer’s girl – possibly wife – tough choices with no one else to turn to.


Robert Harron, Walter Long and Miriam Cooper

Bobby Harron gets work as a small-time crook whilst Mae ekes out a living with her father in the slums. Marsh’s character is the most nuanced, the moral heart of the film who retains the child-like innocence her director was so fond of. She and Harron start a relationship but she refuses his advances, believing in spit of everything around her, in Christian values. The Boy marries her and they form a new family when their child is born and he informs the Musketeer that he no longer wants to work in the business of crime.

 

But it is not so easy to disentangle himself from the underground and he’s set up for a crime he didn’t commit and ends up doing time. Meanwhile the “do-gooders” end up taking their baby away from The Dear One, refusing to believe that the wife of a criminal is capable of bringing up a child. Then the Musketeer notices The Dear One and the scene is set for the breakneck injustices of the final half and hour when murder, circumstantial evidence and conscience all come into play.

 

Lenning has The Mother and the Law as the last time Griffith would examine the world around him in a naturalistic manner and with a critical, crusading spirit. It’s a film that, in a simpler way than Intolerance, gives some balance to our view of his problematic views on race and social order, both of which were challenged at the time and which we must continue to contextualise.


Griffith/Bitzer deliberately allow this close up of Mae Marsh to drift out of focus: she's lost...

Harron, Marsh and Cooper are all good and the latter gives probably her most distinguished performance. Miriam is strikingly modern, dark eyes so worldly and fierce whereas Marsh is Victorian, child-like and under-nourished, running through the Griffith range with almost equal skill to Lillian and Mary. But Cooper is an outlier of a more sophisticated age even if she lacked the other’s raw skill. Harron is also a fine player and inhabits this sunken world with naturalistic ease, he too carrying the shallow frame of a poorer age.

 

Walter Long also shows what a fine performer he was without BoaN’s “make up”, he kept on reminding me of the original Musketeer, Snapper Kelly from Griffith’s Pig Alley (1912), Elmer Booth who died in a car crash in 1915. Harron, who also died a tragic death in 1920, was in that film too, which was co-written by Anita Loos who also worked on The Mother and the Law… Griffith at his best with a largely settled team?

 

Harron behind bars...

The Masters of Cinema Blu-ray is available at a ridiculously reasonable price from Amazon. You probably already have it but you may not have watched The Mother and the Law… in which case please give it a go for DW’s sake and for Miriam Cooper’s lip!


*Miriam Cooper, The Dark Lady of the Silents

**Arthur Lennig, The Mother and the Law Author(s): Source: Film History, 2005, Vol. 17, No. 4, Unfashionable, Overlooked or Under Estimated (2005), Indiana University Press

 

 Bonus screen shots!

Uplifters and indifferent capitalists...

Strike breaking that wouldn't be out of place in a Soviet film...

Miss Marsh emotes


Thoroughly modern Miriam

The Docks of New York

Saturday, 6 July 2013

The birth of the blockbuster… Intolerance (1916)


“There’s almost nothing in the entire vocabulary of cinema that you won’t find in this film…” Orson Welles*

This was DW Griffith’s follow up to The Birth of a Nation and a film intended to show that, contrary to appearances, he was unwilling to tolerate intolerance… Armed with a hefty budget following Birth’s huge success, DW was able to consolidate massively on the techniques employed in the earlier film and his ambition ran riot creating narrative elaborations which are still a challenge for modern viewers.

Featuring incredibly lavish sets, 125,000 extras and 7,500 horses, Intolerance is technically far more advanced than the modestly budgeted Birth.  There is an abundance of camera mobility and smooth cutting between all the scenes (even BoaN had rough edges…). 

Thinking big on a budget...
There is also "the single most amazing shot in the history of film" as Billy Bitzer’s camera descends from some 150 feet in the air down towards the throng, as Byzantium celebrates its initial victory over the Persians. The camera lingers in medium shot showing the main characters amidst thousands of extras. Griffith repeats this graceful moment a number of times and it must have had the impact of a dozen Imax screens in 3D… genuinely astonishing.

Around a repeated framing shot of Lillian Gish sitting over a crib, representing Eternal Motherhood, Intolerance weaves four separate tales from different periods in history, all of which are intended to show the impact of intolerance on the scale of human misery.

Two roles for Constance Talmadge
In every tale it tends to be Griffith’s women who are the focus and there are striking, very different, performances from Mae Marsh, Miriam Cooper and Constance Talmadge in particular.

This a complex and difficult narrative to describe without getting bogged down… but I’ll have a go.

New York City 1914 

The Mother and the Law is set in “modern day” America in 1914 and shows innocent working class folk being crushed by a mixture of industrial relations disputes and moral crusaders. Interestingly Griffith demonises the female “Uplifters” who force goodness on their lowers and do more harm than good. Was this another instance of his struggle to accommodate changes in suffrage?

Mrs Jenkins and the "Uplifters"
Here Mary T. Jenkins (Vera Lewis) the sister of mill boss (Sam de Grasse), comes under the sway of the Uplift movement and causes her brother to invest too heavily in their activities. This leads to his having to cut wages by 10%... a strike ensues which is forcibly put down by militia and the factories armed protectors.

How the other half dance...
I had to check here but there were numerous examples of force being used against trades unions and strikes being curtailed by organised violence from the Great Railroad Strike of 1877 to the 1912 Lawrence Textile Strike…

“They squeeze the money out of us and use it to advertise themselves by reforming us…” feels a little like DW mistrusting liberal sentiment though…

Mae Marsh from girl to woman
The victims of the strike are forced out and have to move to the City. The Dear One (Mae Marsh) struggles in near poverty whilst The Friendless One (Miriam Cooper) falls in with the wrong crowd, a Musketeer of the Slums (Walter Long) who leads her down the path of prostitution.

Robert Harron, Walter Long and Miriam Cooper
The Boy (Robert Harron) is also led into a life of crime. Harron is superb and it’s so sad that he died just a few years’ later after failing to get the lead in Way Down East (R Bartlemass got that).

The Boy tries to go straight inspired by his developing romance with the Dear One but shortly after they wed, he is framed by the Musketeer. Their child is born after he is sent down and Dear One loses even this after the Uplifters decide she is an unfit mother.

Ready for my close-up Mr Griffith...
The Boy is released and confronts the Musketeer who is shot in a jealous rage by the Friendless One (why couldn’t they just have had names DW!?)… But it’s the Boy who gets tried for the murder as she nervously keeps her deadly secret.

Will injustice prevail?  Will the modern day Pharisees crush hope through their selfish desire to do good on their terms…

Babylon 539 BC  

Nothing could be further from working class struggle than the splendour of ancient Babylon although any similarities with Hollywood excess are more than co-incidental.

This segment is really where the scale of Griffith’s vision  really becomes apparent… literally.


Griffith said afterwards that he should just have made the Babylonian story but without the juxtaposition and the immensity, Intolerance just wouldn’t be the same…

Here the very secular conflict between Prince Belshazzar of Babylon and Cyrus the Great of Persia has its foundation on the religious intolerance arising from two rival Babylonian gods, Bel-Marduk and Ishtar. The film doesn’t go into the precise differences in belief but it’s clear that the Babylonians are more than a little decadent…

The Princess Beloved
All is excess in the court of Prince Belshazzar (Alfred Paget) who offers to build an even more splendid city than Babylon for his favourite, The Princess Beloved (Seena Owen).

Against this royal backdrop stands out The Mountain Girl played by Norma’s little sister Constance Talmadge. Constance has all of the Talmadge energy with a more comedic flavour and helps rescue this section and the whole film from earnest indulgence… She not only roughs up most of the male cast but can seemingly handle archery, battle-gear and chariot riding.

“…touch my skirt and I’ll scratch your eyes out!” she says as she munches on a spring onion…

The Mountain Girl impresses the Prince
The Mountain Girl rejects the advances of warrior-singer Rhapsode (Elmer Clifton) as her Prince gives her royal pardon to marry who she likes… she’s the most loyal subject in the whole city.

The High Priest of Bel-Marduk (Tully Marshall - who I’d last seen in The Devil’s Needle), plans to betray his Prince as he secretly worships Ishtar… Cyrus’ armies approach the city and all hell breaks lose.

These battle scenes are amongst the most impressive in all silent film and, as with Ben Hur, involved a lot of actual violence amongst the immense cast of extras. Assistant director, Joseph Henabery’s interview with Kevin Brownlow in The Parades’ Gone By gives an excellent first-hand account of this along with the making of Intolerance… Griffith’s ability to martial story and crew is truly remarkable.


The siege is an epic struggle, literally with…war machines, elephants, beheadings and bodies falling off the massive battlements all in glorious tints of red, purple and blue as the siege of Babylon is won by Belshazzar’s forces.

Then we have Bitzer's stunning camera move: a 1000 Caligari’s in one as the camera swoops down over the huge set teeming with a living mass dwarfed by the sheer scale of the set…

Carry on Babylon
Meanwhile the mind is further boggled as… “in the Temple of Love – The sacred dance in memory of the resurrection of Tammuz.” Babylon and on… more de Mille than Griffith…

But it’s not over as the rebellious priests prepare their ultimate betrayal and the massed armies return under brooding red skies…


Renaissance France 1572 

This section is shorter yet no less affecting as religious intolerance leads the Roman Catholic royal family to order the death of Protestant Huguenots in St. Bartholomew's Day Massacre.

In the court of the conflicted King... 
There’s a good cast with Frank Bennett as the conflicted King Charles IX of France dominated by his spiteful mother Catherine de Medici (Josephine Crowell) and his effeminate younger brother Monsieur La France, Duc d'Anjou (Maxfield Stanley)… From a modern perspective this looks like Griffith’s “intolerating” women and gay men…

This man has two dogs in his doublet...
There’s a romantic sub-plot between Brown Eyes (Margery Wilson another Griffith child-woman) and
Prosper Latour  (Eugene Pallette ... who’s long career included  Going Straight with Norma T and Mantrap with Clara B). The wonderful Spottiswoode Aitken plays Brown Eyes' father – I’ve  recently seen him in BoaN, Nomads of the North, The Eagle and The Goose Woman.

Spotiswood Aitken (middle), Margery Wilson and Eugene Pallette
Catherine has an audience with the King to secure his signature to the order for the massacre of St Bartholomew. At first he refuses to sign…but the intolerants sway him after a long session: “We must destroy or be destroyed.”

St Bartholomew’s morning, the bell toll and the massacre begins…


Judea c. 27 AD
This is the shortest section but the pivotal one in terms of Griffith’s “message”. “The Nazarene” (Howard Gaye) attends the Wedding at Cana where the groom is George Walsh and the bride is Bessie Love…

Bessie Love (centre)
He turns water into wine and makes the wedding party much to the displeasure of the Pharisees… “meddlers then as now. ‘There is too much pleasure-seeking among the people.’”

The Pharisees are shown as self-righteous hypocrites and the ancient version of the Uplifters and the Catholic extremists in France.

Is one of the Pharisees Erich von Stroheim?
Jesus prevents an adulteress about to be stoned: “He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone...”

Precisely DW.

The Nazarene is last seen labouring under the weight of the cross outside the Roman Judgement Hall, after the verdict of Pontius Pilate: “Let him be crucified.”

=============================================                          

The cuts between stories get quicker as the film nears its climax(es)… and the stories simply smash together – “Intolerance, burning and slaying.” A very modern mix of suspense, spectacular action and the hope for a happy ending… but not everyone can be saved.

As the film winds up, angelic hoards descend over a bloody battle field and the fighting stops, prisoners dissolve into a prison wall, children play in the fields… and we see the last glimpse of Eternal Motherhood… Lillian has been sitting there a long time!

Battlefield playground...
“When cannon and prison bars, wrought in the fires of intolerance…
And perfect love shall bring peace forevermore.
Instead of prison walls – Bloom flowery fields.”

As Mr Welles said, Griffith was anchored in Victorian theatre and “old fashioned” in parts of his outlook yet his technical mastery was so modern: this was the birth of the blockbuster.

I watched the Kino DVD which is taken from an excellent quality 35mm print and runs out at 3 hours 17 minutes. It features an excellent score from experienced film composer Joseph Turrin that expertly mixes a modernistic movie tone with more contemporary themes.

Interestingly, Intolerance was also released in two other versions focusing on the single stories, The  Mother and the Law and Babylon… this latter film featured a less downbeat resolution for Constance’s character. This clip is on the Kino DVD along with excerpts from Cabiria (1914) and TheLast Days of Pompeii (1913), both of which influence Griffith and have featured on this blog.

It helped to provide an enjoyable watching experience in spite of the film’s length and convolution. Griffith’s best? Flawed certainly but a masterpiece that is still exhilarating as much as it is challenging.

 *From the introduction to “The Silent Year: Films from the Collection of Paul Killiam”

Ruth St. Denis and Ted Shawn
Top trivia: The Denishawn Dancers played the Dancers of Tammuz… A sixteen year old Louise Brooks joined them six years later, progressing to dance alongside Ted Shawn before being fired by Ruth St. Denis for wanting life handed to her on a “silver salver”…. A phrase she kept locked away for rainy days!