“I don’t
make films to be watched by an impassive eye, I prefer to hit people hard on
the nose…”
Ow!
Strike (Стачка
or Stachka) was Eisenstein's first
full-length feature film, his second being The
Battleship Potemkin and it is as packed full of ultra-quick cuts and brutal
montage as you’d expect but also comedy – who knew the dialectic featured so
many laughs? So, anyone who doesn’t think communists have a sense of humour
better look away now…
Some
modern commentators seem to struggle with the politics but this is history as
cinema as cinematic history: a deliberate political statement that says much
about the state of Russia when it was made: there’s nothing to agree or
disagree with. That is, unless, you’re looking for a fight…
The workers and the managers |
Eisenstein
wanted to demonstrate the importance of solidarity in the face of capitalist
and state oppression and if this language sounds old fangled then imagine
you’re living in Tsarist Russia in 1912 when the strike in question took place.
At times the American influence is so marked that I kept on thinking how this
would all feel if the story was set in the Wild West or mob-dominated Chicago…
people need hero-leaders to turn the tables on bullying of all kinds and the
moral force remains whatever the injustice confronted.
Of course
in the mid-twenties, the Revolution was still being consolidated and part of
this process was the establishment of the mythology of the new regime – no
different from France and the USA in the early nineteenth century. So, yes, Strike is propaganda: history being
written by the victors.
The factory |
Leading up
to the First World War, there had been a number of large-scale industrial
disputes which had been ruthlessly crushed by the old regime: a political
system far behind Western Europe in most respects.
In the
film there is no trades union and the workers are shown to have almost no
rights in the face of a cruel management. Eisenstein’s workers are heroic
figures whilst the businessmen, police and agitators are comically ruthless.
Grigori V. Alexandrov |
The
villainous foreman (Grigori V. Alexandrov) is hyper-actively cruel
whilst the pompous, over-fed Director (B.I. Charuev) and his shareholders drink wine and
eat caviar as their employees starve.
The spies leap off the page... |
The Chief
of Security Police (I. Ivanov) pulls together an evil bunch of agents to spy on
the workers and disrupt their unity and focus. The Chief looks at a page in his book of spies and the chracters suddenly move into life: a neat device as well as a sophisticated edit.
They are a marvellous collection
all gurning away like the animals they are named after; Owl (P.I. Malek), Fox
(A.P. Kurbatov), Monkey (A.P. Yanichevski) and Bulldog (Maksim Straukh).
Fox and Monkey |
This
casting is the result of Eisenstein’s idea of “typage” – the casting of actors
by their physical attributes as much as their acting ability per se. He would
often spend months looking for the right person or rather the person with the
right look. Here it works exceptionally well – were you watching Tod Browning
(not that Lon couldn’t have managed them all on his own…)?
The standout
“actors” tend to be those playing the leading workers especially Aleksandr
Antonov as the organiser of the strike committee, Mikhail Gomorov and Ivan
Klyukvin. They’re all tall, strapping and good looking - they would have made
excellent cowboys.
There is
already much unrest at the factory as the film begins, with management nervous about
agitation: conditions are poor and the workforce is running out of options but
they are not yet decided.
The spark
for the conflict is the theft of a micrometre from the factory. Yakov, the worker
whose tool it was reports the incident to the Foreman who refuses to believe
him. Completely innocent but faced with humiliation and the loss of his
livelihood, he hangs himself in spite of the desperate efforts of his
co-workers to save him. He leaves a note explaining his plight and this leads
to the men walking out.
The death of Yakov |
The
management try to retain control but are thrown into the sludge a suitably
slapstick coup de grace for such Keystone Capitalists.
The
factory falls silent and the workers decide on a list of demands… an eight hour
working day, six for children, a 30% pay rise and a call to be treated fairly…
we know it’s too much.
The orders
start to pile up and the directors seek help from the Chief of Police who sets
his secret agents onto the strikers… they set off to identify the ring leaders and
to lay traps.
A day in the country... |
The
workers are shown in bucolic unity – discussing the way forward in countryside meetings,
it’s an idealised vision and one that is rudely interrupted by the arrival of
mounted police. Before the panicked proletariat are routed their leader gets
them to sit down and the horses back off instinctively.
David Lynch or Sergei Eisenstein? |
The strike
wears on and the workers begin to suffer depravation as the money runs out: the
decision to fight for their rights has cost them dear and there will be worse
to come.
The
narrative progresses with more Hollywood tonality as the Monkey goes off to
recruit the King of Thieves (Boris Yurtsev) to help entrap the strikers. His men
sleep in huge barrels and emerge into the daylight in one of the film’s most memorable
scenes: clearly their baddies.
The King and the Monkey |
The King’s
man, led by his Queen (Yudif Glizer) set fire to a shop building and try to get
the workers to join them in the loot. The workers are too canny and manage to
set off the alarm for the fire brigade to put out the fire but they ignore the
flames and are told to turn their hoses on the workers instead.
Spoilers… The subsequent suppression of the
workers is relentless and still harrowing: they are battered by the force of
the fire hoses and run to ground by mounted police who even invade their
tenements.
Their
leader is half-drowned before being captured and then the army is sent in to
not just finish the job but to eradicate the “problem” once and for all…
The rout of the workers |
“Remember Proletarians!”
is the film’s final call… although I’m not sure how much room there was for any
complacency in the early Stalinist years?
The film
tries to entertain as it informs and there were many examples of the brutal
oppression it describes in the years leading up to the 1917: the revolution
didn’t come from nowhere. In 1924-25 the “dream” of a new world was still very much
alive… the incalculable damage of the Stalinist years was yet to fully unfold.
Eisenstein’s
film has therefore to be taken at face value: a work of a conviction and of good
faith in the Communist project.
The
director used performers from the Proletcult Theatre and there’s a raw edge to
the acting accentuated by the quick-fire editing. His direction is inventive
from first to last including the usual trick shots along with lovely moments
such as a workers meeting seen reflected from a puddle. The cinematography from
Eduard Tisse also deserves mention.
The film was
presented with live accompaniment from Wendy Hiscocks, an experienced
silent specialist I’ve not seen before. She wove some lovely lines around the
revolutionary themes and clearly enjoyed the communistic carry on too. More evidence
if it was ever required of the impact live performance has on our connection to
and enjoyment of silent film.
More
details of Wendy are available on her website.
Strike is available
in DVD from Movie Mail or Bluray from Amazon.com a flying start to one of cinema's most influential directorial careers.